<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>The Ignition Project: Tag accessibility</title>
    <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/tag/accessibility</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Open Source Collaboration Solutions</description>
    <item>
      <title>Accessibility Issues You Wouldn't Think About</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When you write web pages, accessibility should be a key issue on your mind. Everyone should be on the &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; bandwagon, and hopefully thinking about how someone with an aural or a visual disability might parse your web page. But there are some things you just don&amp;#8217;t even think about and anyone pointing it out would just be helping you, right? :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The issue I&amp;#8217;m speaking of is writing content with phrases in it that require aural or visual ability. For example:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Please look around on our site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can you look around a site if you can&amp;#8217;t see it? I wouldn&amp;#8217;t think so. &amp;#8220;Please browse our site&amp;#8221; might make a little more sense but it has a separate issue of basically &lt;em&gt;begging&lt;/em&gt; your visitor to browse your page without giving them any information as to what they&amp;#8217;re browsing to. Give them a short list of awesome things you can do: &amp;#8220;You can learn about X, Y, and Z on our site.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Click here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If a tree falls in a forest and nobody&amp;#8217;s around, does it make a sound? If you press a mouse button and can&amp;#8217;t hear it make a sound, does it click? Well, no. You should always link to a phrase or word that makes sense. &amp;#8220;Click here to schedule a tour.&amp;#8221; is inferior compared to &amp;#8220;Schedule a tour today to learn about X, Y, and Z.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another thing I&amp;#8217;ll bring up is the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_comma"&gt;Oxford comma&lt;/a&gt;. Growing up, they taught us to &lt;strong&gt;always&lt;/strong&gt; use an Oxford comma, so pardon me if I sound biased. Anyways, I always say to include it because screen readers are &lt;em&gt;stupid&lt;/em&gt; and won&amp;#8217;t put the right emphasis on a list consistently unless you explicitly delineate the list. Plus, the US government printing office requires it, so that seems like a good enough reason to include it in sentences. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:71cc2087-d9b6-45de-9fbd-df08e0363a41</guid>
      <author>Keith Gable</author>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2009/09/02/accessibility-issues-you-wouldnt-think-about</link>
      <category>Howto</category>
      <category>accessibility</category>
      <category>rant</category>
      <category>html</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

