<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>The Ignition Project: WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST</title>
    <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Open Source Collaboration Solutions</description>
    <item>
      <title>WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m looking for a $50 AMD Athlon 64 X2 for Socket 939&amp;#8230; I keep getting outbid on eBay, so I&amp;#8217;m asking you guys if you might possibly have the heart to let this thing go for $50&amp;#8230; :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7d2fc21b-e6c4-4efd-aba0-df72b96d32d9</guid>
      <author>Keith Gable</author>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst</link>
      <category>computer</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST" by Matt</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AFAIK Vista does somewhat take advantage of multi core systems, though I could be drastically wrong on that.
I actually wish I had the money for a multi core system (well actually a new system in general, lets face it this thing is old.) Would make compiling some things faster and running multiple Virtual machines easy (I can only run 1 VM on this system, on XP, Vista and Linux).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:22:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:42f79bd5-19de-4f4a-b880-f3f801dadc26</guid>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst#comment-1596</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST" by Keith Gable</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are lots of reasons to want an up-to-date single core processor&amp;#8230; for one, if you just want a cheap processor to fit in the new platform board you have to buy. Cause nothing uses both cores yet anyway unless you&amp;#8217;re in Linux and have a kernel scheduler that actually distributes the load across the processors, and even then, that only gets benefited by multi-threaded applications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Never really had an AMD BSOD on me. My current machine is just being flaky and it has something to do with the network controller I think..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:51:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e02bf69f-a928-4fa7-91e4-4b06f3faf8db</guid>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst#comment-1595</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST" by Matt</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;^.- Why would you want a single core processor this day and age?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;See you had the opposite problem as me&amp;#8230; Windows 95 on my first AMD CPU BSOD&amp;#8217;d all the time, I later found out why (Something to do about the AMD&amp;#8217;s being too fast) but I still don&amp;#8217;t trust AMD for any computers within my household.  I&amp;#8217;ve never had a linux kernel panic on my P2 or a BSOD&amp;#8217;s or kernel panics on my P4HT (Hey and this thing runs Vista better then it did XP and still no BSOD&amp;#8217;s!) :/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:06:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9a0e61ed-1c5f-479d-8021-c64b62149044</guid>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst#comment-1594</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST" by Keith Gable</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; an Intel guy until I got fucked in the P3 era. &amp;#8220;We can&amp;#8217;t go over 1GHz, it&amp;#8217;s just not possible!&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;The &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; way you can get fast RAM is with Rambus!&amp;#8221; &amp;#8230;. shortly followed by the Athlon 1GHz in the first example and DDR SD-RAM in the second example. And Intels still aren&amp;#8217;t as cheaply available as AMDs. I can get a $30 AMD Athlon 64 - Intel doesn&amp;#8217;t even offer an up-to-date single core processor (There is no &amp;#8220;Core 2 Solo&amp;#8221;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, AMD needs to spend some money on upgrading their fabs and process technology to remain competitive. And I would definitely choose a 4-way Opteron workstation over a 4-way Xeon workstation (aka &amp;#8220;Mac Pro&amp;#8221;). For normal desktops, though&amp;#8230;. I don&amp;#8217;t know which I would choose.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:05:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c011adfd-4268-4759-86af-15eb053d0ee7</guid>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst#comment-1593</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"WTB [AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Socket 939)] PST" by Matt</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If I had (or even liked amd) that CPU I&amp;#8217;d sell it to ya for a buck.  But alas I&amp;#8217;m an Intel dude.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:57:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9c53cd0b-6b1c-4840-b70a-f408ae1cb089</guid>
      <link>http://www.ignition-project.com/articles/2008/04/22/wtb-amd-athlon-64-x2-socket-939-pst#comment-1592</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
